Military Upgrade - The US military's three vehicle upgrade programs look smarter after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, from surveillance robots to drone defense and missile defense. repeated ambushes by Russian forces in Ukraine.
A Robotic-Medium Combat Vehicle fires around a target during a live-fire test of the vehicle at Fort Dix, N.J., June 30, 2021. (US Army)
Military Upgrade
Video after video shows Russian armored vehicles burning in Ukraine, raising questions about whether the armored vehicles are antiquated. But this is not the right question. On the contrary, the question is whether the armed forces of the United States would be better - to which the answer is yes, with some caveats.
Tatas, M&m May Participate In Rs 12,700 Crore Army Fleet Upgrade Project
Basically, the US military will have more success because of better training - the secret sauce we uncovered in the Ukrainian conflict. But the US military is also investing in three key technologies that will strengthen its weapons for future warfare.
If the US military has its way, instead of ambushing cars, the first machines in the danger zone could be robotic scouts. Vehicle-mounted active protection systems will intercept anti-tank missiles before they hit, while specialized air defense vehicles will use guns, missiles and even lasers to shoot down drones. All three technologies are a work in progress, but based on the lessons learned from the Russian invasion, these three investments counterbalance the near-term threat America may face with armored vehicles.
The most revolutionary of these developments - but also, the most distant - is the Robotic Combat Vehicle program, a family of expensive reconnaissance vehicles: QinetiQ's seven-ton RCV-Light and Textron's 10-ton RCV-Medium. (Possible heavy RCV will be 30 tons).
The RCV is still experimental, and the military is putting Qinetiq and Textron prototypes through years of field testing with no decision to buy in quantity. There are many technical problems to work on, especially the balance between artificial intelligence and remote control: extraterrestrial environment is more confusing and confusing than empty space, so the autonomy of ground-vehicles is behind unmanned aircraft. drones, and current RCVs require constant. direction from human operators. It's powerful—two humans instead of a robot, now—and vulnerable, as it opposes the control link. The military hopes to make the robot more autonomous and eventually allow humans to maintain more RCVs.
Australia To Upgrade Military Bases And Expand War Games With U.s.
But a more exciting strategy is already talking about "frontline robots" that escort human soldiers into danger zones. While the current generation of remotely piloted RCVs are not yet ready to completely replace combat vehicles, they do have real scouting capabilities, with human operators using sensors to spot them. scout for possible ambush sites.
Now, veteran enemies won't show up by firing at the first robot that hits the road; They'll try to hold their fire until they're on human targets - but it gets a lot harder if the RCV climbs up to where you're hiding and starts hovering over you. Capable of carrying heavy machine guns and Javelin anti-tank missiles, the RCV is a threat that the enemy cannot ignore, causing them to abandon their position or show them losing to a robot bullet.
On the other hand, the U.S. military needs protection from adversary robots, especially unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that have proven increasingly ubiquitous and effective. with war zones from Nagorno-Karabakh to Ukraine. They are difficult targets for conventional air defense systems, especially since they are small, slow, low-flying and cheap - often cheaper than the missiles used to produce them. The United States is therefore preparing the Short Range Air Defense (SHORAD) version of the Stryker eight-wheeled armored vehicle, armed with both Stinger missiles and an anti-aircraft gun. A laser-armed version will enter testing in September: the lasers do not yet have the ability to burn armored weapons, but their high accuracy and unlimited ammo (they can continue firing as long as they have) make them suitable for aircraft that do not the drone. .
Of course, some threats will always make it beyond the killer drones and robot scouts, so it's important to upgrade the vehicles you have. Here, American armored vehicles already have one big advantage over their Russian counterparts: they tend to be bigger.
Conditions That Qualify For A Military Discharge Upgrade
The main battle tank of the United States, M1 Abrams, has grown from 60 to 75 tons as it has grown over the years, while the Russian T-90 in the latest upgrade is 51 (46.5 metric tons, according to the official site of Rosoboronexport) . The US Navy's largest tank, the M2 Bradley, has about 40 tons in its latest A4 version, while the Russian BMP-3 has a little more than 20. At 19 tons, it evolved into the mid-twenties with Various weapon packs and other upgrades. All that weight makes the American machines expensive, more fuel hungry, and not able to cross many bridges, but it also allows for the protection of large weapons.
Still, even Yemen has manned Abrams anti-tank missiles, although Saudi Arabia's model lacks some US-only upgrades like high-density uranium weapons. (The Saudi strategy is also bad). So back in 2018, the US military decided to upgrade several battalions of M1s with Israel's Trophy Active Protection System, which detects and shoots down incoming radar missiles. The smaller Bradley gets the same Iron Fist-lite, also made by Israel, although the Bradley has to be upgraded to the latest model, the A4, to generate enough power to drive. Although such systems have had little success against heavy anti-tank gunfire—as such cannons fly too fast and too hard—APS' have proven effective against heavy rockets. explosives, which are (relatively) slower and more fragile.
The defense of at least some Russian tanks is similar. "Ukraine [soldiers] complained bitterly about the 'magic shield' that sent their AT-5 guided missiles out of control in the air or on the ground, as the missile hit a [Russian] tank," Philip Kerber of the Potomac Institute wrote in 2015. But the AT-5s (known as the 9K113 Konkurs) were a Soviet design in the 1970s, and the targets were Russia's latest tank, the T-90. In current attacks, by contrast, the Russians have deployed T-72s and T-80s. a large number.
On the other hand, the Ukrainians are now using advanced Western missiles such as the US Javelin and the British NLAW: these are the "highest attack" weapons for thin air, which come at a vertical angle and are mostly anti-aircraft. I cant. According to the open source intelligence website Oryx, while the older tanks were heavily damaged, at least the T-90s were also destroyed. This suggests that the most advanced missiles can overcome even the last defenses of Russia.
Army Eyes Major Firepower Upgrade To Counter China
Will Trophy be better than high attack? Although this question is very sensitive and there is no clear answer from open sources, the sources suggest that this will happen. "Active security systems in the area are capable of countering attack threats," an Army official told me. "The specifics will be sorted."
The new integration process and open systems architecture together with FRRAA and FARA can bring a revolutionary improvement in the current fleet performance.
"When it comes to digital warfare, practice makes perfect, and we can't start practicing too soon," wrote Schuyler Moore, chief technology officer at US Central Command. Rescue the vehicle as the service conducts a training exercise in Europe to counter the Russians.
Soldiers from the 2nd Cavalry Regiment based in Vilseck, Germany, have installed Saab's Mobile Camouflage System, or MCS, on four of their Strykers, said Scott Caldwell, director of marketing and sales for the Barracuda business unit. of the company.
Battle Weary Bahrain Looks To Upgrade Forces
The four attackers are currently undergoing intensive training with their fellow countrymen in Hohenfels, Germany, and will undergo an official evaluation in June. There, the military will decide whether the camouflage system will be available as a program of record or not, he told reporters on May 11 at a briefing at Saab's facilities in Karlskoga, Sweden.
Defense News is in Sweden the week of May 8 as part of a Saab media tour sponsored by the company with travel and hotel accommodations.
Caldwell describes the mobile camouflage system as a "dressed skin" for the vehicle that changes its physical appearance—allowing it to better blend into its surroundings to the naked eye—and also has features such as : Contains long-lasting enhancements - the wave and its signature handle. Mid-wave, short-wave and short-infrared thermal sensors and radar.
"Currently nothing—not even advanced signature management systems—can make a tank disappear," he admitted. "We're peeling back the onion of safety. If we're able to detect, see or target a system or a vehicle, we're going to increase safety and give that crew a chance to decide. Are they going to destroy the enemy. Do they change the position of the vehicle? It gives them minutes and significant seconds respectively
How To Upgrade A Military Discharge?
Ultrasound tech classes, ultrasound tech education, ultrasound tech pay, ultrasound tech colleges, ultrasound tech salary, schools for ultrasound tech, ultrasound tech salary florida, heart ultrasound tech salary, ultrasound tech major, ultrasound tech online, ultrasound tech training programs, ultrasound tech bachelor degree
0 Comments